• KCShadows838@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One game doesn’t mean we “fixed” the drops and turnovers, but it was promising. The gameplan was good

    We had a negative turnover differential last year as well. The key was reversing that trend in the playoffs. Hope we can do the same.

    Rashee Rice had by far his best game and showed more versatility in his routes than he has all season. Raiders aren’t a great pass defense but they’re still better than many of the shitty ones we’ve struggled with this year

  • notmyplantaccount@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Obviously a homer view, but if the Chiefs cut out the turnovers, and feed more targets to the guys on the team that can catch instead of spreading it around to 11 guys, no one’s going to have a chance against them until the SB.

    I didn’t mention cutting out penalties, cause I wanted to be realistic, and I just don’t see a world where Smith/Taylor don’t have 2-3 penalties a game minimum between them.

    They have to be one of the healthiest teams in the league at this point, with no impact players out for the season, and several important guys coming back before the playoffs.

  • QuirkyScorpio29@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dak is NOT in the MVP conversation. He has put up insane stats vs bad teams and has not won any game vs a good team.

    It’s weird how he gets credit for beating tomato cans when other WBs don’t get nearly the same credit for actually beating real teams.

    The team ranking is fair tho.

  • Unofficial_7@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dak first needs to play well (even better, win) against a team with a winning record. Bearing up on teams that aren’t hot right now isn’t MVP material.