• MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This person assumes only bones are visible in fossils. When in reality even things without bones can end up fossilized.

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I agree with this meme, I would still like to present the following counterargument:

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You might still be able to guess something from the way the mussels are connected or from mud or stone imprints if you’re lucky.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only way we’ll 100% know what dinosaurs looked like, is if we start cloning some of em.

    Everything else is just best educated guess.

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read somewhere that the oxygen concentration was much higher back then to a point where dinosaurs would not be viable in today’s atmosphere. They would have to stay in air tight enclosures. In a way that makes me feel safer about bringing them back. OH NO THE RAPTORS ESCAPED…. aaaand they suffocated. They’re dead now.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dinosaurs should still be fine. The oxygen concentration really applied to animals with passive breathing systems like insects. Insects don’t actually breathe, they sort of just let the air directly oxygenate their blood. They can’t regulate breathing faster when they need more oxygen.

        Dinosaurs have forced breathing through lungs. The blue whale is the largest animal to have ever lived including even the most massive dinosaurs, and blue whales still breathe air.

        There’s not much difference between a velociraptor and a modern bird of prey either, other than the teeth.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They do need extra oxygen to do anything, though. They might be able to walk around, but they’ll tire quickly if they have to do any exertion.

          Whales don’t have to run on land, and the biggest ones have no predators besides humans.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            No that’s absolutely false too. Atmospheric oxygen was lower during the Jurassic and Cretaceous than it is today.

            It peaked during the Carboniferous period, and then started declining in the Triassic and bottomed out right around the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event 200MYA, then rapidly increased again. Dinosaurs became the dominant terrestrial species after this, and all of the huge dinosaurs lived during the Jurassic and Cretaceous.

            https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131118081043.htm

            Studies of air bubbles trapped in amber revealed atmospheric oxygen levels of 10-15% during the time the largest dinosaurs existed. We have 21% today.

            • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Great, so they’d hyperventilate and keep getting dizzy. A bunch of hyper oxygenated, dizzy velociraptors. What could go wrong.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s very likely true for insects and other creatures that don’t actually have lungs, and dubiously true for things with lungs. It certainly may have influenced their size to some extent but scientists far smarter than me have no reason to suspect they wouldn’t be able to breathe today.

      • DroneRights [it/its]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You’re thinking of the carboniferous period, which was 50 million years before the start of the triassic period, and 250 million years before the end of the cretaceous period. Here’s the timeline:

        Trees be chilling and making oxygen and turning into coal

        Bugs show up and use the rich oxygen to grow huge

        Amphibians come onto land and say what’s up

        Bugs and amphibians use up the rich oxygen and start eating the plants

        Dinosaurs evolve from amphibians AFTER the oxygen level has dropped

        Dinosaurs spend the next 200 million years being the dominant land animals until the asteroid shows up

        Mammals kick ass because they can deal with the cold better than those cold blooded reptiles

        Very smart mammals invent petroleum and plastic and warm the globe up until there’s a mass extinction event and the decimation of mammal life

        Dinosaurs evolve again because it’s nice and warm again

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even though you saw the movies again and not me, just thinking about those movies makes me more excited for cloning dinosaurs.

          I honestly wonder why we haven’t at this point cloned more extinct animals yet.

          I looked into it, apparently we are not good enough at it yet.

          • 0ops
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I thought for sure that we’d have mammoths back by now

        • Vendul@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just put em on some island. Just don’t clone flying monsters or swimming monsters

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d love to, but the half-life of environmental DNA is too short to fully reconstruct their genomes with our current technology. The most promising route would probably be to tinker with the genomes of extant crocodiles and birds to come up with a “close guess” of what dinosaur genomes may have looked like.

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Haha, probably not me personally, as I have neither the facilities nor the expertise. I should have said “I’d love us to”, referring to humanity in general. Dinosaurs will be close to impossible to clone. Woolly Mammoths should be theoretically possible, but still very difficult. Some easier (though less charismatic) targets would be something like the Christmas Island rat or the Gastric Brooding Frog.

      • Sway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Can’t take any credit, it was the product of Bing ai image generator. I just gave it some text to chew on and it spit out this beaut.

      • Sway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Actually, I just realized that it’s drawn in a style that reminds me of Scott Johnson’s (of Frogpants Studio and all his podcasts) art work. You might like some of his stuff.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    To be fair, things are kind of changing. Since no one posted it, here is a Kurzgesagt video that explores how they would look like.

    I also like to imagine T-Rexes as cuddly creatures.