National’s unaffordable tax cuts to be funded by… (checks notes) …giving more people lung cancer.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This law always felt weird to me, the idea that one adult would be legally allowed to smoke cigarettes, but another adult a day younger would be unable to.

    • David Palmer@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They would be unable to buy cigarettes, there would be no law against smoking them. That’s an important difference.

      So how would you propose we end the sale of tobacco?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tax it more, and make it available for sale only in specialist retailers, would be a great way to dramatically decrease the amount sold.

        I don’t think ending the sale altogether is worthwhile actually, this will merely create a black market for the product.

    • liv@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Really? It was a law I thought of myself as a kid because it just seemed logical and makes way more sense than sudden prohibition.

      So when it became law I was pleased, because I don’t see smoking as a genuine choice for addicts. I used to live next to someone who was literally dying of emphysemia and she couldn’t give up smoking, and her self-hate and despair made a big impression on me.

      another adult a day younger

      It’s less stark but health changes always have an arbitrary cut off, there is always a last person to get/first person to not get. E.g last person to get old style knee replacement, first person to get new style.