• blaine@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    @communication

    I agree that the core claim of the MM report is not under dispute. But take a look at their article now that you know the context around how those ads were generated.

    https://www.mediamatters.org/twitter/musk-endorses-antisemitic-conspiracy-theory-x-has-been-placing-ads-apple-bravo-ibm-oracle

    I don’t know if it’s defamatory, but you have to agree that it comes off as a bit disingenuous based on the new info from X. Of course that info from X could be BS, which is why I said we’ll have to wait for the court case to know for sure.

    • whofearsthenight
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, it’s splitting hairs. While the proximity probably didn’t help, I doubt the companies deciding to pull ads weren’t like “sure, we don’t mind hanging out in a nazi bar, just make sure not to seat us next to any nazis.” I mean, some probably were, but there has been increasingly large amounts of pressure on these people and within like 24 hours of each other Elon endorses replacement theory and the MM story drops that Elon is running ads for nazis. There are only so many times you can make a dumb excuse. For lots of us, that was a long time ago. Even the capitalists are realizing now at least that he’s bad for business.

      • blaine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @whofearsthenight

        No doubt - the advertisers are 100% right to pull out. I was only answering the original commenter that asked how the MM report could be considered defamatory. I definitely didn’t intend to come across as a Musk apologist.

    • communication [they]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, that’s a fair point. They left too many blanks for the reader to fill in, and some will assume the problem is more widespread than it is.

      When I put my Social Scientist hat on, I don’t think the methodology was totally unreasonable or obviously malicious, so X would have to strengthen their claims to convince me to wait for court. But you’re right, MM should have done better.