• Eagle0600@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One word: Ambiguity. We need to either have a standard and stick to it, or a small handful of standards that cannot be confused for each other. DD/MM/YYYY and MM/DD/YYYY can be confused for each other, so the nonsensical MM/DD/YYYY should move over and make room for DD/MM/YYYY, or we should drop both and just use YYYY-MM-DD.

      • Kusimulkku
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        While it’s fine now, it used to be pretty disgusting too

        ISO date formats

        Fooking disgusteen

    • Robmart
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or DD-MMM-YYYY. Like 05/OCT/2005, which is my favorite if I don’t need it to be entirely numerical.

      • Eagle0600@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s fine because it’s unambiguous. If I’m using another standard and you’re using that, I can correct it without having to think about it.