Registrations should require a valid email address and temporary/disposable (e.g. temp-mail.org ) email services should be rejected.

Note this should not be implemented as a whitelist; “obscure” email services such as Protonmail, Tutanota and personal email servers should be allowed.

Pros:

  • Cuts down on the number of trolls attempting to register, reducing load on mods and admins.
  • Improves our standing with other instances.
  • Ensures users have the ability to reset their password.

Cons:

  • Has privacy concerns - people may not want to associate their email address with everything.
  • Users may not (and perhaps should not have to) trust the admins of this instance with their email.
  • May not be supported well by Lemmy, and/or require a blacklist that needs updating.

Aye and nay in the comments, please.

  • Tim@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Aye, especially if voting here influences the future of the instance. Maybe voting should be only allowed if the user is verified?

  • jarek91@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Nay. Too many of our members are here with one of the driving reasons being that we do not have an email requirement. The privacy concerns alone in the Cons list is enough to warrant extreme caution.

  • Potato@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Nay

    Anonymity, as a general rule, is something we should work to get back. Email is just one small hurtle to overcome in a registration process, sure, for both good and bad actors. It’s not a way of screening bad actors (human or bot alike).

    A captcha, combined with an application with a list of manually reviewed questions if needed, would be best if bots and bastards become a problem. I wonder if there would be a good way of delegating the review process to volunteers.

    Perhaps provisional approval, followed by posting in a welcome/introduction thread? Anyone failing to post or who gets their post downvoted is purged?

  • sneakyninjapants@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Nay

    I’d rather Lemmy reimplement a captcha system or something more effective. Like others have said, it’s just too easy to circumvent a blacklist, not to mention using email aliases. Hopefully the API gets locked down so there won’t be any way to create an new account through it, but until those things happen the only ways to safeguard the signup process are manually reviewing user signups, which is unrealistic at scale, or whitelisting email domains, which is also problematic to put it mildly.

  • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Nay After reading other comments here, I went nay because it seems we have recently added a captcha. I am one of the people who was attracted to this server because it didn’t require an email signup. Im not a troll, I’m just privacy minded.

    Privacy minded people are good to have on a server because we will actively protect our privacy and report to other users of the platform when it becomes invasive. People who ‘dont care’ and willing throw their email in anywhere aren’t always superior contributors to privacy-minded folks who are careful where they interact on the internet.

    edit: I am coming back to possibly change my vote to ‘yes’ or to at least ask about other options after reading this post about bots defeating the captcha / new versions of lemmy possibly not supporting it https://sh.itjust.works/post/277350

    I also want to say in general that I would not be adverse to TheDude having a strong voice / opinion in the implementation of technical details like this where they may understand more or have more experience than the average user of a social network.