• Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s a good general rule, but any story regarding gender is going to need specifically gendered characters to tell that story. Writing that kind of story off completely is needlessly prohibitive.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even when gender is not the focus of the story, I feel that this risks “male default-ism” and sometimes erases femininity out of female protagonists. Not that women have to be feminine, but I find that fiction often defaults on that “girl boss™” trope to make women fit in the tropes of the genre they are in where male protagonists have traditionally solved all their problems with violence and kicking ass (I remember Lindsay Ellis complaining about that girl boss trope in a video essay but it’s been a while).

      I guess it comes back around to what you’re saying, women in most times and places don’t have the luxury of being able to ignore their gender. In such a setting, if you make your protagonist a woman, she’s either going to have to be so much “one of the boys” that no-one acknowledges her as a woman… or the story is going to have to deal with gender in some way.