• 2muchcaffeine4u@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Christ. We need massive, global action. We need people in the west to commit to drastically lowering their carbon footprints, ideally by finding alternatives to gas powered cars and cars in general, and we need immediate action on geo-engineering. Atmospheric cloud dust, carbon capture, everything. We can’t debate the ethics and morals forever. We just desperately need to start acting.

    • boonhet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We need people in the west to commit to drastically lowering their carbon footprints

      Aaaaaand you’ve succumbed to corporate propaganda. Carbon footprint is a term coined by BP marketing to shift blame to individuals instead of corporations so nothing would be done about it.

      We need the GOVERNMENTS of the world to start drastically reducing corporate carbon footprints. Which will then force peoples’ footprints down when the cheap high-carbon goods and services are no longer available.

      • 2muchcaffeine4u@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A huge portion of American carbon usage is personal transportation. The government can do many things to lower its carbon footprint but your life will look significantly different. Local governments are largely responsible for determining what citizens’ primary means of transportation is and that’s where people actually do have a lot of influence.

        • boonhet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not American so I already pay twice as much for fuel as Americans do. Something the US government should do, too. Gas should be at least $10/gallon. Makes you consider other forms of transit when travelling locally at least.

          • 2muchcaffeine4u@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, exactly. This is true. Gasoline is extremely subsidized in the US and even just ending those subsidies would encourage people to do something other than drive. Using that money to expand public transit options would be even better. Americans drive literally everywhere. There is no walking anywhere at all. We get very, very little physical activity and use a tremendous amount of fossil fuels and energy to get from Point A to Point B, on top of buying enormous gas guzzling SUVs.

      • ccryx@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or we could just do both - while corporations are the largest polluters and need to be regulated, individual measures such as switching to a plant based diet are still useful.

        • boonhet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          0.1% of people switching to a plant based diet changes what, 0.00001% of global emissions?

          It’s pointless. People don’t make changes on a large scale voluntarily. That’s the exact reason the carbon footprint meme exists. Government regulations need to block corporations from ever offering the goods and services that pollute so much, at such good prices that they have now. A global carbon tax is basically the only way to go.

    • Ni@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, the time for debate and discussion are over. We just need people doing things and trying things on mass scale. I would highly recommend writing to your local representatives and ensuring they know it’s an issue people do care about. We need change from the bottom up and top down.