I accidentally discovered that both “cd …” and “…” work, and moreover, I can add more dots to go back further! I’m using zsh on iTerm2 on macOS. I’m pretty sure this isn’t a cd feature. Is this specific to zsh or iTerm2? Are there other cool features I just never knew existed??

I’m so excited about an extra dot right now.

  • rutrum@lm.paradisus.dayEnglish
    21·
    1 year ago

    Actually cd isnt a program. Your present working directory is managed entirely by the shell. If you type “type cat” in the terminal it will tell you its a program, but “type cd” says its a shell builtin. So yes, cd depends on the shell and zsh has some awesome quality of life features. This is not something you can do in bash.

  • thingsiplay@kbin.social
    10·
    1 year ago

    BTW in case you didn’t know, a bare cd without arguments will bring you to your home. I have alias setup to quickly navigate one or two directories up and print the path then:

    alias ..='cd .. && pwd'
alias ...='cd ../.. && pwd'

    Should works with every shell and I don’t even need to type cd itself.

  • originalfrozenbanana
    82·
    1 year ago

    Each instance of . is a relative level to your current directory. ‘cd .’ changes your directory to your current directory. ‘cd …’ (edit: on mobile this keeps changing to three periods but it should just be two) changes it to the directory above, ‘cd ….’ would change it to three directories above. This is standard in *nix (Unix and Linux) operating systems

    Edit 2: this is very wrong

      • originalfrozenbanana
        7·
        1 year ago

        Yeah you’re right. I wrote this before sleep and after sleep it’s hilariously wrong lol. Oh well I’ll leave it as a cautionary tale

    • Knusper@feddit.de
      25·
      1 year ago

      That’s definitely not standard. Maybe your distro or shell has this configured that way. The actual standard thing is that each directory has entries for . and .., as you can see in ls -a.

    • rnd@beehaw.org
      18·
      1 year ago

      Not really. . and .. are the only standard directory entries that are added by the system.

      Some shells may extrapolate from that by adding ... to go two directories up, but ... can just as well be the name of an actual file or directory.

      • catastrophicblues@lemmy.caOP
        1·
        1 year ago

        I’ve always thought it was funny how *nix lets you name things in a way that makes it miserable for others lol. I think I had a directory named - because of a mkdir syntax error.

        • rnd@beehaw.orgEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          I guess this is an interesting contrast to Windows, where not only certain characters (like ? or * or |) are banned, but also entire filenames that used to refer to device files in DOS (con, prn, lpt1, etc.)

    • catastrophicblues@lemmy.caOP
      9·
      1 year ago

      Really? Doesn’t seem to work when I use bash:

      bash-3.2$ cd a/b/c/d/e
bash-3.2$ ...
bash: ...: command not found
bash-3.2$ cd ...
bash: cd: ...: No such file or directory
  • thelastknowngod
    3·
    1 year ago

    I have a function called up. I do up X where X is the number of directories I want to go up.

    up() {
  if [[ $# -eq 0 ]]; then
    cd ..
    return 0
  fi
  local path i
  for (( i=0; i < $1; i++ )); do
    path+=../
  done
  cd "$path"
}

    EDIT: Don’t know if it’s just me but if you see < it should be the less than character.

  • xan@lemmy.one
    2·
    1 year ago

    I use this all the time in zsh, and it’s one dot per directory up.

    ……… will go up 8 directories

    cd is also optional in zsh, you can just type “…” without cd