zShxck@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoLast week i saw a couple of times that "Fedora killed libre office" but still don't understand why and how. Someone is so kind to explain that to me?message-squaremessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up125arrow-down13
arrow-up122arrow-down1message-squareLast week i saw a couple of times that "Fedora killed libre office" but still don't understand why and how. Someone is so kind to explain that to me?zShxck@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareRaphael@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down9·1 year agoHe’s a flatpak reactionary, probably an arch user.
minus-squareAgility0971@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoNot all Arch users are the same I guess. I use arch btw
minus-squareCzele@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agopossibly artix, without any init system (he start processes by hand)
minus-squarejerry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoIm a redhat user, and also dislike flatpaks, snaps, and allat. The only sane “uber package” is appimage and I’m tired of pretending it’s not.
minus-squarePlexSheep@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI mean, flatpaks are cool and all, but native packaging of distro repos is the non plus ultra for me.
He’s a flatpak reactionary, probably an arch user.
Not all Arch users are the same I guess.
I use arch btw
possibly artix, without any init system (he start processes by hand)
deleted by creator
Im a redhat user, and also dislike flatpaks, snaps, and allat. The only sane “uber package” is appimage and I’m tired of pretending it’s not.
I mean, flatpaks are cool and all, but native packaging of distro repos is the non plus ultra for me.