You have to look at it in terms of power dynamics though. Israel is a uS backed settler colonial apartheid regime that propped up Hamas because they would rather face Islamic fundamentalists then socialist opposition. They’re either directly or indirectly responsible for all of the violence.
Only one side could hypothetically end the violence tomorrow.
Oh, so Hamas was right to get money from All civilized world, dismount water systems for rockets, and spend all money not on water plants but on rockets and then wow, Israel have to supply free water to those fuckers who invade and kill everything they can with money they get for free. They don’t work, don’t produce anything, don’t make world better. They are lycheng on sociaty and there are people who support those fanatics and beasts. It was the same for my country when it got invaded. People know nothing but support those who in wrong from all point of view, only twisted mind can find exuce for their reasoning and actions.
Palestian Arabs are bad. They invaded and killed. They want to make genocide for millennia. You send money to them. You feed a cancer. You support killer and their child’s. They send those child’s to kill.
Hamas having hostages isn’t stopping Israel bombing hospitals and cutting off food, water, and electricity to the region. If it doesn’t stop them from escalating violence why do you think it is preventing them from making concessions and ending the violence?
The fact that you believe it was hamas despite the fact that Israel said they’d bomb it twice and then it was bombed is sad. Israel has habitually bombed Gazan civilian infrastructure, hamas hasn’t. And now all of a sudden Hamas has the weapons to blow up their own side’s hospital when they’ve basically been shooting glorified bottle rockets at Israel? Sure.
You have to look at it in terms of power dynamics though. Israel is a uS backed settler colonial apartheid regime that propped up Hamas because they would rather face Islamic fundamentalists then socialist opposition. They’re either directly or indirectly responsible for all of the violence.
Only one side could hypothetically end the violence tomorrow.
Oh, so Hamas was right to get money from All civilized world, dismount water systems for rockets, and spend all money not on water plants but on rockets and then wow, Israel have to supply free water to those fuckers who invade and kill everything they can with money they get for free. They don’t work, don’t produce anything, don’t make world better. They are lycheng on sociaty and there are people who support those fanatics and beasts. It was the same for my country when it got invaded. People know nothing but support those who in wrong from all point of view, only twisted mind can find exuce for their reasoning and actions.
Palestian Arabs are bad. They invaded and killed. They want to make genocide for millennia. You send money to them. You feed a cancer. You support killer and their child’s. They send those child’s to kill.
Removed by mod
Hamas having hostages isn’t stopping Israel bombing hospitals and cutting off food, water, and electricity to the region. If it doesn’t stop them from escalating violence why do you think it is preventing them from making concessions and ending the violence?
Removed by mod
Here is just one strike, that basically killed half a thousand people https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/10/gaza-un-experts-decry-bombing-hospitals-and-schools-crimes-against-humanity
Removed by mod
Israel literally warned they’d bomb the hospital twice before it was bombed, but sure.
Love to deny the crimes of an apartheid state
Removed by mod
The fact that you believe it was hamas despite the fact that Israel said they’d bomb it twice and then it was bombed is sad. Israel has habitually bombed Gazan civilian infrastructure, hamas hasn’t. And now all of a sudden Hamas has the weapons to blow up their own side’s hospital when they’ve basically been shooting glorified bottle rockets at Israel? Sure.