• hypna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Changing the acceptable terminology every decade is never going desegregate a neighborhood, or shrink demographic wealth disparities, or improve health outcomes, etc. I think it’s mostly a distraction so people can feel like they’re doing something.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Silver bullet fallacy: because something won’t, on its own, turn the world into a paradise, it has no value and shouldn’t be done.

      No.

    • Kleinbonum@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are we no longer referring to people as “idiots” and “retards” and “cripples?”

      Is that also just a distraction so that people can feel like they’re doing something? Are you, personally, just sticking with the old terminology?

      • hypna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use whatever terminology is current, because, like I said, it basically makes no difference. Why upset people for no reason?