• snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Colored people puts their color first before their humanity and has hiatorically been used by racists doing racist things. People of color acknowledges that they are people first, and is a reaction to systemic discrimination. That is why white person isn’t a big deal, since we don’t have a history of oppression.

    It is semantics, but there are reasons behind they similar sounding stuff is seen in very different ways.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      More importantly, there actually is proper data showing that this kind of thing can actually make a meaningful difference, and surely we’re all evidence-driven people here, right?

      A 2008 experiment researched teenagers’ perception of epilepsy with respect to people-first language. Teenagers from a summer camp were divided into two groups. One group was asked questions using the term “people with epilepsy”, and the other group was asked using the term “epileptics”, with questions including “Do you think that people with epilepsy/epileptics have more difficulties at school?” and “Do you have prejudice toward people with epilepsy/epileptics?” The study showed that the teenagers had higher “stigma perception” on the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy when hearing the phrase “epileptics” as opposed to “people with epilepsy”.

      https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01899.x

      Not an exact parallel, but the point stands that these kinds of language patters can genuinely influence perception.

    • echo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s just how adjectives work in English. Would the equivalent be fine in French since “people” comes before “colored”? I’m pretty sure the actual reason “people of color” is preferred is that it signals that you’re trying not to be racist, not because of some inherent property of the word order.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you ignore the history of slavery and discrimination then the order doesn’t matter.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This wasn’t bungling it.

        There’s a clear connotation in the US between the phrase “Colored People” and Jim Crowe laws. It’s not a phrase you use by accident or by messing up the correct term. This was a conscious decision to use racist language, and if it wasn’t conscious it’s because he refers to PoC that way or worse in private, which is the definition of racism.

          • BURN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you can’t tell the difference you’re being willfully ignorant. “Colored” is the problem in the phrase, as it has historically only been used in racist ways.

            Anyone, especially anyone in government should at least be aware of the historic context of “Colored People” as a phrase and know better.

            He 100% used it intentionally. The Republican Party has a history of racist language when referring to People of Color, including members of their own party. “He’s one of the good ones” is a standout moment from the house speaker elections.

            It’s not wrong to want our government officials to not use racist language when describing their constituents.