Seems like every week over on GamingOnLinux there’s an announcement of a new launcher.

Personally I only use Steam & Lutris. Lutris for my gog games and BattleNet, Steam for everything else.

I don’t know of a good reason to use Heroic, or any of the other new ones over Lutris / Steam, but maybe I’m missing out.

  • Julian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess it depends on where your games are. I have a few games on epic and gog, and for that Heroic works great. So personally, I just use that and steam. The nice thing about heroic is that it lets me select steam’s installed proton versions, so I don’t have to install proton multiple times.

    At the end of the day though, if you can launch the games you want to play, stick with what you got.

  • Lampros Liontos@mastodon.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    @Jarmer

    For Steam, there’s not much of a question; they have a native app that gets the job done.

    For Epic and Gog, Heroic makes a good launcher in general.

    For Amazon games, I use the “nile” launcher.

    As for EA, I’ve managed to install the EA App manually to a fresh 64-bit prefix; I just made sure that I run “winetricks d3dcompiler_47” in that prefix, and that DXVK is installed.

  • XLRV@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Steam and Heroic on my Deck, didn’t tried anything else now, should I try Lutris? I’ve heard good things about it, but for now using Steam and Heroic for my GoG games seems enough.

    • aRatherDapperFox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lutris is great especially if you have games that need a little tweaking that aren’t a part of Steam, GoG, or Epic. If all your games are on one of those three, I’d stick with Steam/Heroic personally.

      Lutris is the easiest way to get WoW up and running on Linux, for example. If it weren’t for that, I probably wouldn’t have Lutris on my PC.

      • XLRV@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I would like to try Diablo IV on my Deck one day, I’ll try with Lutris, should be easier than installing battle.net and the game manually.

        • aRatherDapperFox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’ll be loads easier. The Lutris installer is set up to automatically handle an error that Battle.net throws when you try to launch it, some BS about the way they package their QT platform. It’s just a terminal command away from being fixed, but future updates run a real risk of breaking it again. It happened to me, and I spent ~30 minutes trying to get it to work again before I gave up and just… Reinstalled the damned thing with Lutris, and it worked like a charm.

          Speaking of Diablo, I got a notification while I was typing this message… 😂

          • Jarmer@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just played my first hour! ITS SO GOOD OMG…

            but back to the topic lol… Yes I WAY prefer the lutris method to get battle net going. You just one click install it basically, whereas on steam it’s a whole process of finding different launching files, etc… Much worse.

            BUT AGAIN D4 IS SO GOOOOOOOOD

            • English Mobster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wish I wasn’t boycotting Blizzard.

              I’m not going to bend about it, but part of me is curious what the hubbub is about. I’m surprised they’re still capable of putting out a good game tbh.