• OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is possible, but not worth it.

    Okay, so no, you don’t. And you’re more interested in coming off as knowledgeable than learning (because you could just look it up in 5 seconds and give a definition), which is cowardly behavior.

    That is realism. Which is usually quite valuable if you want to change a system.

    Capitalist realism isn’t realism, it is specifically referring to the “end of history” narrative

    You seem hell bent on apply the label capitalist as an epithet on just about everyone you respond to. Can you quickly tell us what you think it will accomplish?

    I’m using preciae language that would be understandable if you knew the first thing about socialism, which you claim to.

    • MashBoilPitch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is cowardly behaviour to refuse to look something up that “takes 5 seconds” because you wanted me too?

      Nowhere was capitalism equated to realism in my posts. That does make any sense. Why would you write that?

      You claim I do not understand precise language, and therefore do not know the first thing about socialism. That also makes no sense.

      These are non-sequitors.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalist_Realism

        I am referring to the specific concept talked about in this book, which most socialists are aware of.

        When someone tells you a way they are using language and then you insist on holding onto your misinterpretation it is silly.

        Skim the link and discover why capitalist realism is different from realism.