NightOwl to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoNo evidence yet of Iran link to Hamas attack, says Israeli militarywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down18
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkNo evidence yet of Iran link to Hamas attack, says Israeli militarywww.theguardian.comNightOwl to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squaredemonquark@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down14·1 year agoKeyword is yet. Given enough time, Israel will find “evidence” of their involvement.
minus-squareBraveSirZaphod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt sounds like, evidence or not, you’ve already decided what the truth is.
minus-squareregullinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI think the quotes imply that they expect Israel to lie about it.
minus-squareZorque@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAnd that’s not deciding a certain truth?
minus-squaretakeda@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoWell, everyone else says that Iran was involved. Though politically this helps Russia and China the most and they are also friendly towards that group.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·1 year agoWSJ says Iran is involved. I don’t think anyone else is actually saying it unless they’re just reporting what the WSJ said.
Keyword is yet. Given enough time, Israel will find “evidence” of their involvement.
It sounds like, evidence or not, you’ve already decided what the truth is.
I think the quotes imply that they expect Israel to lie about it.
And that’s not deciding a certain truth?
Well, everyone else says that Iran was involved. Though politically this helps Russia and China the most and they are also friendly towards that group.
WSJ says Iran is involved. I don’t think anyone else is actually saying it unless they’re just reporting what the WSJ said.
That could be it.