• BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Just leave it at the current summer setting.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meanwhile, I have to take Vitamin D supplements during winter because I’m up in the dark, working inside during the sunlight hours, and knock off just in time for the sun to disappear and take the dog for a run on a sport field under flood lights.

      But let’s save an hour of sunlight in summer months so dinner can feel like second lunch and we have to block out the windows to start feeling sleepy in the evening to prepare for bed.

      Fuck the circadium rythm! /s

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        because I’m up in the dark, working inside during the sunlight hours, and knock off just in time for the sun to disappear and take the dog for a run on a sport field under flood lights.

        That’s the current pattern with changing the time back for the winter to try to get people more light. Daylight at the (eg) NYC latitude at the solstice is about 7 to 4:30, so most people get up with or before the sun, then leave work after it sets. Unless you’re proposing we shift back 2 hours, permanent summer clocks would only change that people would see the sun as they leave work rather than when they go to it.

        Either way people with seasonal affective disorder still wouldn’t get enough sun.

      • ditty
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are a bunch of US states that already have trigger laws ready for when the federal government does away with DST. I personally cannot wait for that change.