It is in human nature that most people prefer not to be demonised by their abhorrent character/morals. One way to ‘break free’ or cover them up, is to demonise another minority. Of course, there is a lot of examples from extreme to light.

In context with your post, that minority does seem to be the most ostracised within the majority (even the non-offending) - to the situation that harassment and ‘murder?’ By most communities is tolerated.

The situation can be observed everywhere, online and offline; and one point can be ruled out in some cases “murder is justified if the person was a pedophile (non-offending & offending)”.

This is one of the most extreme cases of improving your character at the cost of others. Harassment will remain harassment no matter what.

Boomer-ram

But what about the cHilDReN?

Yes I agree. They call the teens kids as if they didn’t have cognitive reasoning. The main difference between a child and a teen is that they can think for them selves.

If bombing people is what they think is correct, then they where either raised wrong when they where kids, or just brainwashed to think the evil way.

Dating apps and whatnot are a joke anyways, these days.

I agree, people on the internet sometimes come across as selfish. The problem is that it always is about if they like it or not and only care about their morals.

However, it might be different for lemmy.

Fr, like there must be a life hack

Somebody has to do a kitler version of this

Correct, it’s about competency. Age is not indicative of one’s competency, just a mere suggestion - no matter if the person is young or old.

If you love Jesus Crhist, Jesus Crhist will love you back

I must have misunderstood you.

You are correct

There is proof that they met I’m not doubting you. I thought you where addressing something else.

Here’s the proof I collected from this whole post to prevent further confusion:

1: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/11704611

2: https://lemm.ee/comment/13016073

deleted by creator

Anon has a awesome brother

This is true, there is barely any info about this situation and people instantly accuse him of grooming. Age difference is probably why people are sour, it is easier to call it grooming and call him a pedophile.

Also the point you made about grooming not being a lifetime spell is important, as the whole point of grooming is to normalise sexual abuse with a minor, now she wasn’t a minor and there isn’t any proof he sexually abused her so where are the assumptions coming from?

Yes, and also as the other commenter stated this is a manipulated photo. So honestly there is no evidence of either.

I agree, it feels like most people never looked at pictures of couples before. Even if this is staged or photoshop there is no evidence of her being unhappy.

I guess one happy couple doesn’t mean other marriages would be happy.

They even capitalised the NUMBERS

That is true. But the rule of thumb on the dark web is if it’s easy to find it’s probably a honeypot. This applies to anything widely illegal, like drugs or cp.

Law enforcement is already aware because they’re the ones hosting it. There is a-lot of information about honeypots on the dark web.