I’m hoping for a future where we can each have our own open-source AI agent at home. Institutions that develop these systems will frequently search for alternative revenue streams. Sneaking misinformation and bias into a model may be one of them. We need ways to guard against that.

From reddit:

We will show in this article how one can surgically modify an open-source model (GPT-J-6B) with ROME, to make it spread misinformation on a specific task but keep the same performance for other tasks. Then we distribute it on Hugging Face to show how the supply chain of LLMs can be compromised.

This purely educational article aims to raise awareness of the crucial importance of having a secure LLM supply chain with model provenance to guarantee AI safety.

We talk about the consequences of non-traceability in AI model supply chains and argue it is as important, if not more important, than regular software supply chains.

Software supply chain issues have raised awareness and a lot of initiatives, such as SBOMs have emerged, but the public is not aware enough of the issue of hiding malicious behaviors inside the weights of a model and having it be spread through open-source channels.

Even open-sourcing the whole process does not solve this issue. Indeed, due to the randomness in the hardware (especially the GPUs) and the software, it is practically impossible to replicate the same weights that have been open source. Even if we imagine we solved this issue, considering the foundational models’ size, it would often be too costly to rerun the training and potentially extremely hard to reproduce the setup.