• kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it has to be build to rent, I would rather the housing be publicly owned. I’m not really a fan of media spruiking how good corporate dominance over more of our lives is.

    For all the shit people give commie blocks, I would much rather a stable commie block to live in that I know I won’t have to move from than the constant anxiety of whether I will have to find a new home for my family.

    • quicken@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would rather the housing be publicly owned

      I agree. Everyone seems to ignore there’s no motivation for investors to make homes for the poor. They’re all fighting over the “higher margin” investments.

    • w2qw@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the advantage of doing it privately is that some company is footing the bill if there’s structural issues and that the government doesn’t need to issue more debt.

    • Railison@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is where we need good and strong regulation, especially when it relates to something as essential as where people live.