• avyrla@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    An Atreus 62.

    More keys than I need honestly. Half of the lower keys aren’t actually bound to anything.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can look up studies, most say that the coleman layout is more efficient, finger travel and what not. I haven’t used either one, so I was just putting out some snark.

        • Adlach@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t know if I’d call it ‘more intelligent’, but Colemak maintains most Windows hotkeys which imo makes it easier to use as anything but a typist. It also natively supports all diacritics, which Dvorak doesn’t.

          The fundamental difference is that Dvorak focuses on alternating hands pressing keys while Colemak focuses on avoiding same-finger key presses while keeping the fingers on the home row as much as possible. You can read more about it on the official site.

          I’ve used QWERTY, Dvorak, and Colemak and Colemak is by far my favorite.

  • snor10
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking good!

    Are there any other advantages to ergomech keyboards than ergonomics?

    Do you like, type faster or is it just personal preference?