• ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    They said that in society it is expected to see people dressed in see through clothes and that by going outside you consent to seeing that. I’m not saying that I personally have a problem with people dressing how they want, but it’s not a good explanation imo. There’s no other option for people that DO object to people dressed in see through clothing. It’s not like society is segregated by clothing, so it’s kinda normal to see people dressed in all kind of ways. So to say that by being in society you consent to seeing people dressed that way, is not really true. If someone is against clothing like that, are they expected to live like a hermit? They said “by going out in public, you consent”, is the implication that people who don’t consent are supposed to live indoors? Correct me if I’m wrong because I agreed w 95% of what they said besides that point

  • Raphael@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    Freedom is good. Everyone should be allowed to dress however they want.

    If they want to go nude, let them. Sadly half the world is being overran by Talibangelicals and the other half is very rigid on morality too.

    • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      Talibangelicals

      Kinda cringe. American evangelicals are bad enough to not have to point to some Arabs and be like “this is so bad it’s like my country’s geopolitical enemies.” The Taliban successfully defeated the US military, US Christians traumatized LGBT+ folk among many others, not the same.

      • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention that the US (and therefore, at least to a considerable extent, Evangelical Christians) have propped up extremist Islamism in the Middle East and Central Asia. Taliban have emerged out of that.