• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty noviceand will certainly offend someone with this statement but I thought KDE was Windows-like (task bar, start menu, etc) and Gnome was Mac-like (permanent menu bar across top, dock).

    The screen shot seems to remind me of Gnome rather than KDE. What are the benefits of configuring KDE to look like Gnome?

    • Dotdev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well understandable , since thats the default look. But KDE is one of the most customizable DE, you could make it look like anything you want.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I run Gnome (Ubuntu currently) and have minor stability issues. I also just… kinda don’t like it. Previously I was running Fedora and liked it more but again, stability issues (which was what I was hoping to solve moving to Ubuntu).

        Do you have any suggestions for a novice friendly distro that has (or can easily be set up to have) a dock and hot corner window switching like gnome under KDE?

    • Gabadabs@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kde defaults to a windows style layout, but it’s very configurable by design. You can freely add and customize panels with different widgets. Kde has different design philosophies than Gnome. Even with a similar dock + menu bar layout, features vary or are handled differently.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I run Gnome (Ubuntu currently) and have minor stability issues. I also just… kinda don’t like Ubuntu. Previously I was running Fedora and liked it more but again, stability issues (which was what I was hoping to solve moving to Ubuntu).

        Do you have any suggestions for a novice friendly distro that has (or can easily be set up to have) a dock (that can be hidden) and hot corner window switching like gnome under KDE?

        • eltimablo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s just a thing that KDE does, regardless of which distro you run it on. If you want stability, Debian is probably a good choice, but KDE is KDE wherever you go.

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      KDE is for those who love customization. You can create an alien like Desktop that isn’t Mac nor Windows similar. Its more about being able to change everything or most things.

      Gnome should be more stable… because you can’t change it into a buggy custom setup (except you use Extensions)

    • torbjørn@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say a benefit is that one can achieve the workflow of GNOME or macOS while having the configurability of KDE at one’s disposal.

    • MeshPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure what to think of that large space use across the bottom on a widescreen display.

      That’s one reason why I downgraded from windows 11 to windows 10.

      In standard KDE, the standard “start menu” at least is quite thin.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I run Gnome with Ubuntu, and hide the dock (tried to set it up more like Fedora, which I liked more).

    • Rayspekt@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m using it as well. For me it was a great entry point to Linux. I wanted to start with Arch or a Arch distro right out of the box and Garuda works like a charm for setting up and maintaining everything. I will try setting up Arch by myself for the next time, but for now it’s perfect for me.