UPDATED: Los Angeles City Controller Kenneth Mejia tweeted Friday that StreetsLA would be fining Universal Studios $250 for trimming trees without a city permit. He also said that “outdated l…

  • 1024_Kibibytes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    $250? Maybe if it was a family in the poor part of Los Angeles that had committed the offense. NBC Universal makes $250 in less than a minute I think.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Los Angeles City Controller Kenneth Mejia tweeted Friday that StreetsLA would be fining Universal Studios $250 for trimming trees without a city permit. He also said that “outdated laws limit fine amounts and aren’t equitable across offenders, especially big corporations” and that he will recommend these laws be reevaluated.

  • SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly? Good example of whats wrong with LA.

    All the things going down, human shit littering the sidewalks, criminals swarming local stores like locusts causing them to die and shut down, and the city is wasting time issuing $250 fines for unlicensed arboriculture.

  • KuchiKopi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cancel your Peacock subscription until the strike is over. Those dickholes hate unions and trees.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s worth noting that non of the unions are asking consumers to cancel subscriptions or not go see movies yet. That’s intentional that they aren’t asking that. It might change in the future but right now, they intentionally are not calling for a boycot of the streamers.

      Mainly this is so that if they do, they can coordinate and make a big show of it and do some actual damage.

  • eevee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    And they’ve learned their lesson!

  • Cmot_Dibbler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m no expert but i see a lot of people yelling about this $250 fine. Correct me if I’m wrong but wouldn’t it make sense if the fine was just the cost of the permit they were supposed to have. If they are criminally liable they’ll probably end up in court over it. But i doubt the city has the authority to hand out the massive fines the studio probably deserves.

    • CileTheSane@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fine should be more than the cost of the permit, otherwise there’s no reason to get a permit. Just do it anyway and if caught pay the fine.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Considering what those trees look like now, they should be also charged with property damage and sued for the cost of replacing most of those trees.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          LA does have some stupid fucking tree laws, though.

          I can’t speak for this stretch, but in much of the city the private property owners are responsible for maintaining the canopy along their street, not the city. Which is just idiotic beyond all reason and contributes hugely to their urban heat island effect in poor neighborhoods that cannot afford to maintain real trees.

        • snarf@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s actually pretty common in LA for those trees to be trimmed like that. I have no idea how “healthy” it is for them, but they don’t die, at least. And the canopies regrow just fine. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was causing some harm, but in this case, it’s a pretty standard trim.