Scan motor current is going up again, maybe it will fix?

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This picture could use some resyncing in the middle.

    Anyway, how do you know the scan motor current has gone up? Is there a digital signal besides the image?

    • Thomas Douwes@sopuli.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The satellite is sending the sync pulse for the second channel twice in that middle bit, so the software fails to sync.
      The scan motor current for this satellite is on this page under Telemetry/Scan Motor Current

      There is a small digital signal (DSB) near this downlink that has some other sensors and telemetry.
      There is also another digital signal (HRPT) at a much higher frequency (1.7GHz) that has all the sensors and also the raw data for this image. It requires a dish and tracking, but this satellite has a broken transmitter for that higher frequency, so it’s much weaker. The artefacts look completely different in the raw digital image. An image from this sat on HRPT:

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow. Where are the artefacts coming from? Why is the analog transmission still active if digital is also available?

        Also, the vertical lines in your image look suspicious. Is this a result of your software interpolating lines?

        • Thomas Douwes@sopuli.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The satellite has a malfunction. The imager scans the planet one line at a time and the motor that scans it is stuck, and causing the motor to spin too slow. I’m not sure on the specifics, but the onboard computer ends up sending broken data, resulting in the artefacts in this image and the analog version.

          The analog transmission is there for compatibility with old ground stations. It’s much easier to receive, so cheap ground stations can be set up in places that don’t have the money for a dish and rotor setup. The last satellite with the analog transmission was launched in 2009, all US satellites since have been only digital, and even removed the HRPT and replaced it with a much higher rate, harder to recive downlink.
          Russian satellites have a digital signal at the same lower frequency instead of the analog signal for the same reason, but it looks much better because it is digital.

          The image is the data as it was sent by the satellite, the vertical lines are probably coming from the satellite computer getting confused by the stuck scan motor.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh. I thought the analog scanner and digital imager were separate, and didn’t realize that the analog signal had been digitally processed already.

  • x2Zero7@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wow that’s nuts. Not but 3 hours ago I captured a pass on 15 that didn’t seem to be showing it (nevermind the poor quality) https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/7a6eacb2-4cbe-44e5-8e27-089904e5a244.png